Thursday, July 21st 2022

Chinese SMIC Ships 7 nm Chips, Reportedly Copied TSMC's Design

The Chinese technology giant, SMIC, has managed to advance its semiconductor manufacturing technology and shipped the first 7 nm silicon manufactured on China's soil. According to analyst firm TechInsights, who examined the 7 nm Bitcoin mining SoC made for MinerVa firm, there are doubts that SMIC 7 nm process is somewhat similar to TSMC's 7 nm process. Despite having no access to advanced semiconductor manufacturing tools, and US restrictions placed around it, SMIC has managed to produce what resembles an almost perfect 7 nm node. This could lead to a true 7 nm logic and memory bitcells sometimes in the future, as the node advances in SMIC's labs.

Having done an in-depth die analysis, the TechInsights report indicates that TSMC, Intel, and Samsung have a more advanced 7 nm node and are two nodes ahead of the Chinese SMIC. The results are not great regarding the economics and yield of this SMIC 7 nm process. While we have no specific data, the report indicates that the actual working chips made with older DUV tools are not perfect. This is not a problem for the Chinese market as it seeks independence from Western companies and technology. However, introducing a China-made 7 nm chip is more critical as it shows that the country can manufacture advanced nodes with restrictions and sanctions in place. The MinerVa SoC die and the PCB that houses those chips are pictured below.
Sources: TechInsights, via Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

62 Comments on Chinese SMIC Ships 7 nm Chips, Reportedly Copied TSMC's Design

#51
55566112
SMIC didn't steal the design because Taiwan is a part of China.
These chips are for internal use only, for government and military equipment
Posted on Reply
#52
Tomorrow
55566112SMIC didn't steal the design because Taiwan is a part of China.
These chips are for internal use only, for government and military equipment, no matter how old senile Uncle Sam tries to stop China, it still prevails.
Ok chinese shill with a single post:kookoo:
Posted on Reply
#53
Palladium
LMAO @ IP rules...Because the blameless USA totally didn't steal industrial tech from Europe in the 19th/20th century.

Not to mention the #1 reasons IP transfers happened to china all boils down to "BUT MY OWN GREED FORCED MY WESTERN HAND"
Posted on Reply
#54
big_glasses
medi01How it worked with German companies: "ah, we have to innovate anyway, they will steal our old stuff, we'll invent new".

Germany pioneers wind power generation. China gets involved, fast forward to 2022: last German company in that market is shutting down.
Makes me remember the segway "incident" :)
Posted on Reply
#55
boidsonly
"....are two nodes ahead of the Chinese SMIC."

Not for long.
Posted on Reply
#57
boidsonly
That Tweet was probably written by Intel. They are the only Corp to really benefit from the $50B pkg deal.
Posted on Reply
#58
Chas778
It's only one chip so far, and bitcoin miners are hardly advanced technology. Time will tell if more advanced designs can be produced.
55566112SMIC didn't steal the design because Taiwan is a part of China.
These chips are for internal use only, for government and military equipment, no matter how old senile Uncle Sam tries to stop China, it still prevails.
Taiwan is not a part of China it's a sovereign nation. If China tries to change that. It will be in a world of pain!!
Posted on Reply
#59
big_glasses
boidsonlyThat Tweet was probably written by Intel. They are the only Corp to really benefit from the $50B pkg deal.
Intel is the biggest, but wouldn't the others also benefit from it?
like GloFlo, L3Harris, qualcomm, etc
Posted on Reply
#60
Count von Schwalbe
Nocturnus Moderatus
big_glassesIntel is the biggest, but wouldn't the others also benefit from it?
like GloFlo, L3Harris, qualcomm, etc
Qualcomm is like AMD, designs chips but is fabless. This is for foundry companies. GloFlo will benefit, but to a much lesser extent than Intel, as they are not on the latest nodes. Texas Instruments probably will not receive much at all, not being in the same type of market.
Posted on Reply
#61
big_glasses
Count von SchwalbeQualcomm is like AMD, designs chips but is fabless. This is for foundry companies. GloFlo will benefit, but to a much lesser extent than Intel, as they are not on the latest nodes. Texas Instruments probably will not receive much at all, not being in the same type of market.
ah blimey, I just read a few of the on a list of 10 biggest manufacturers semiconductor in US, to remember who produced.
my bad
Posted on Reply
#62
95Viper
Threads that should/will be closed

Threads whose topic may be seen as political or religious or politically or religiously sensitive, this includes posts within a thread.
Threads of malicious, spiteful or toxic intent against any user, group or company.
This may include a thread going off topic with posts that include the above depending on how the community is responding.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 18th, 2024 00:01 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts