Monday, March 11th 2024

Intel 14A Node Delivers 15% Improvement over 18A, A14-E Adds Another 5%

Intel is revamping its foundry play, and the company is set on its goals of becoming a strong contender to rivals such as TSMC and Samsung. Under Pat Gelsinger's lead, Intel recently split (virtually, under the same company) its units into Intel Product and Intel Foundry. During the SPIE 2024 conference for optics and photonics, Anne Kelleher, Intel's senior vice president, revealed that the 14A (1.4 nm) process offers a 15% performance-per-watt improvement over the company's 18A (1.8 nanometers) process. Additionally, the enhanced 14A-E process boasts a further 5% performance boost from the regular A14 node, being a small refresh. Intel's 14A process is set to be the first to utilize High-NA extreme ultraviolet (EUV) equipment, delivering a 20% increase in transistor logic density compared to the 18A node.

The company's aggressive pursuit of next-generation processes poses a significant threat to Samsung Electronics, which currently holds the second position in the foundry market. As part of its IDM 2.0 strategy, Intel hopes to reclaim its position as a leading foundry player and surpass Samsung by 2030. The company's collaboration with American companies, such as Microsoft, further solidifies its ambitions. Intel has already secured a $15 billion chip production contract with Microsoft for its 1.8 nm 18A process. The semiconductor industry is closely monitoring Intel's progress, as the company's advancements in process technology could potentially reshape the competitive landscape. With Samsung planning to mass-produce 2 nm process products next year, the race for dominance in the foundry market is heating up.
Sources: SeDaily, via Wccftech
Add your own comment

12 Comments on Intel 14A Node Delivers 15% Improvement over 18A, A14-E Adds Another 5%

#1
john_
A node that is not yet a reality is offering 15% improvements over a node that is not yet a reality.
Posted on Reply
#2
thesmokingman
This shit about how great you're gonna be I swear it crap has got to stop being news. We get this crap in every industry, fake it till you make it BS.
Posted on Reply
#3
N/A
5 nodes in 4 years. How it really is
10(7) has existed since 2018 now in latest plus(4) iterations 7 by now 6 years under the belt
7(4,3) is where 10(7) was in 2019 just starting
5(20A) remains to be seen and better be monolithic for desktop. server and mobil make as many chicklets as you want. I don't care, but don't you dare mess with desktop. 18/14/10 exist only in the labs. And surely beyond our wildest dreams and pay grade.
Posted on Reply
#4
Denver
Intel, the company of promises(not fulfilled). :p
Posted on Reply
#5
Sabotaged_Enigma
john_A node that is not yet a reality is offering 15% improvements over a node that is not yet a reality.
Exactly. Intel have been creating this hype for quite some time now.
Question is for what? like attracting funds?
Posted on Reply
#6
Denver
Sabotaged_EnigmaExactly. Intel have been creating this hype for quite some time now.
Question is for what? like attracting funds?
Attract more money from governments to pay for the 4 Way Cross-Fire loan they have. :P
Posted on Reply
#7
Eternit
N/A5 nodes in 4 years. How it really is
10(7) has existed since 2018 now in latest plus(4) iterations 7 by now 6 years under the belt
7(4,3) is where 10(7) was in 2019 just starting
5(20A) remains to be seen and better be monolithic for desktop. server and mobil make as many chicklets as you want. I don't care, but don't you dare mess with desktop. 18/14/10 exist only in the labs. And surely beyond our wildest dreams and pay grade.
I think 18A is just tweaked 20A both previously knew as 5nm, like 3 is tweaked 4, or rather 4 is beta version of 3 and 20A is beta version of 18A.
They realised, they went too far with new naming, so next generation will be 14A and 14A-E previously knew as 3nm.
On the other hand I think they invested more money in development of 20A/18A so it will come to the market quicker than 10/7 and 4/3. So probably in 2027 they will have good yields and performance 18A comparable to TSMC N3.
Posted on Reply
#8
Noyand
john_A node that is not yet a reality is offering 15% improvements over a node that is not yet a reality.
I mean, Lunar Lake is using 18A. And it seems that there are already a few lunar lake prototypes in the wild (I would hope so for a 2024 release :D) . TSMC was already talking about a 15% improvement for their 2nm in 2022, before 3nm was available on commercial products
An Intel Lunar Lake prototype pops up in the SiSoft Sandra database, throws down an early gauntlet, and leaves in a cloud of mystery | PC Gamer

If it turns out that this allegedly 18A wafer was a fake, (meaning a canceled/delayed by one-year Lunar Lake) I will rename myself Pat The clown :D
Posted on Reply
#9
Carillon
14A is such a bad name, looks like an iteration of 14++++
Since it's just a name, 15A would have been so much better, since it has a 15% improvement, just like the good old kabylake times, with its 15% improvement over skylake.
Posted on Reply
#10
N/A
Carillon14A is such a bad name, looks like an iteration of 14++++
Since it's just a name, 15A would have been so much better, since it has a 15% improvement, just like the good old kabylake times, with its 15% improvement over skylake.
It seems but there is 10A and 7A shortly after. And 15-20% density each step until it's the end subatomic level. Sram Cell is stuck at 0.0199 mum2 anyway so no more caches only brute force clock speed.

I'm thinking 18A is 7Ghz capable and 14A 8 GHz all core boost at iso power.
Posted on Reply
#11
Frank_100
N/AIt seems but there is 10A and 7A shortly after. And 15-20% density each step until it's the end subatomic level. Sram Cell is stuck at 0.0199 mum2 anyway so no more caches only brute force clock speed.

I'm thinking 18A is 7Ghz capable and 14A 8 GHz all core boost at iso power.
To cool it you will need something like this:
Posted on Reply
#12
Minus Infinity
Well we need more competition for TSMC and Scamsung has been a major let down as usual. I hope for one things turn out well for Intel's fabs.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 21st, 2024 23:03 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts