mechtech"the US government is preparing to announce a multi-billion dollar grant for Intel's chip manufacturing operations in Arizona next week, possibly worth more than $10 billion."

For one of the highest earning companies in the states?!?!

What have they been doing with all those profits from the past decade??

Ferrum MasterWhy? ASML is Dutch...

DimitrimanLet me put a different perspective to this discussion: how would you feel about grants for more chip manufacturing in the US within the context of China taking over Taiwan and the control of 61% of the global market?

mechtech"the US government is preparing to announce a multi-billion dollar grant for Intel's chip manufacturing operations in Arizona next week, possibly worth more than $10 billion."

For one of the highest earning companies in the states?!?!

What have they been doing with all those profits from the past decade??

95ViperStop the demeaning comments about people of any nation... This will not be tolerated.
You have been warned.

DavenAfter reading through all the comments, in the end, this government investment will directly aid Intel in the making of its own products over the competition. The US government should not be putting its finger on the scale to the benefit of more Core Ultras and Xeons unless they have secured a guaranteed promise that Intel will manufacture only third party chips with fabs built using government funding. Of course that will not happen.

DavenAfter reading through all the comments, in the end, this government investment will directly aid Intel in the making of its own products over the competition. The US government should not be putting its finger on the scale to the benefit of more Core Ultras and Xeons unless they have secured a guaranteed promise that Intel will manufacture only third party chips with fabs built using government funding. Of course that will not happen.

stimpy88Exactly, it is an unfair advantage they are being given. That money will be spent on R&D to help Intel against its competitor. People forget just how many fabs Intel has.

Gary Patton: Clearly as a technical guy, I love the tech challenges of bleeding edge, but for our employees, for our customers, for our shareholders, at the end of the day we have to be a profitable business and a sustainably profitable business. We all stared at the numbers, and it was pretty clear that for the bleeding edge stuff, the [return on investment] is continuing to erode. I think you see in the press and you’ve probably written about it—Moore’s Law is slowing down. There are fewer customers at the leading edge. The capacity needed at the leading edge is going down with each [manufacturing process technology] node, and at the same time the R&D expense is escalating. It’s tough to get off of the R&D spending drug and sit back and actually rake in the revenue.

tfpWait until you hear about the kind of money big government spends subsiding the Auto industry, Agriculture, Airplane and Defense contractors, Energy (a lot to Oil and Gas), the Banking Industry, other Tech Companies, Media Conglomerates, etc...

NoyandThe US government doesn't seem to care that much about the CPU war itself, but the foundry war and local production. And technically the competition can also benefit from that move IF is open to everyone. I've seen people say that AMD/Apple/Nvidia can't do that because Intel will steal their chip design...
But Samsung Electronics made chips for Qualcomm, without ever turning their Exynos into Snapdragon clones.

I also really doubt that clients don't have a protection about that. That would be dumb, and that would also be dumb for Intel to do that, and harm their reputation and abilities to get clients. Intel foundry became open by necessity, not charity. They need external clients to keep the foundry alive. GF decided to stop doing bleeding edge because they failed to make benefits from it :

GlobalFoundries CTO on Why the Company Abandoned the “Bleeding Edge” - IEEE Spectrum

You can't just snap a bleeding edge foundry into existence, if the volume of clients is too low, whatever start-up the US gov would decide to back-up might make the same move as GF after a while, making it a bad investment.

DavenSince you bring up GloFo, I’m not entirely sure they shouldn’t get these subsidies. I bet each dollar of that $10 billion would be much better spent on lower tech, higher yield nodes and chips. Glofo had the courage to stop going down the advanced tech rabbit hole. I trust Glofo more than Intel and Intel’s ocean of powerpoint slides.

NoyandGlobal Foundries do benefits from the Chips act, they got $1,5 billion. I'm not a fab expert, but I would guess that older tech that already been figured out and needs machines less expensive than ASML latest and greatest need less money.
GlobalFoundries and Biden-Harris Administration Announce CHIPS and Science Act Funding for Essential Chip Manufacturing | GlobalFoundries
But from what I know from the US, focusing on older tech while watching Taiwan and Korea pull ahead and becomes the uncontested leaders in chips manufacturing isn't on brand. Just look at all the shit that they pulled once China became too hot on their heels as a technological power. The US will never accept to lose that race. Heck, even the EU who was never in that race is trying to get local bleeding edge manufacturing.

The EU is more balanced though, GF and STM got €2.9 billions for low tech, TSMC got €3,5 billion for low-tech, and Intel €9billion for Bleeding edge (for a fab that will cost €30billion).

I get that people dislike Intel, but the reality of the situation is that nobody is going to put their eggs into the same basket. The EU wanted TSMC to build bleeding edge as well... but they refused. 10 years from now, you don't know if organisational or political changes might prompt TSMC to stop doing bleeding edge outside of Taiwan. China military forces are also getting more active near the island. Nobody want to be caught off-guard if shyte hit the fan.